Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from United States of America v Amadi, 2017 ONSC 3446 (CanLII):
The Court of Appeal for Ontario in United States v. Larosa[8] articulated a three-step approach to the air of reality test for disclosure in the extradition context: (1) the allegations must be capable of supporting the remedy sought; (2) there must be an air of reality to the allegations; and (3) it must be likely that the documents sought and the testimony sought would be relevant to the allegations.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.