Just as in King v. Mongrain, the one-sided presentation of evidence did not provide an adequate basis on which the motion judge, acting in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions, could determine that a final custody order in the father’s favour was in the children’s best interests.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.