In Yang, it seems to me that if the information was not being satisfactorily provided because the manager of the County was unable or improperly informing himself, a fair reading of both rules 31.03(2) and rule 30.10(2) would have been to permit the order under those rules. Likewise, in Tulsa v. Walsh a fair reading of rule 31.10 would have been to permit the order to be made, as Sutherland J. in fact said.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.