In Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 SCR at para. 116, L’Heureux-Dubé J. stated: In the absence of expressed restrictions relating to the incidence of custody, such as the child’s place of residence it must be assumed that an existing custody order or agreement reflects the best interests of the child and that such interests lie with the custodial parent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.