[41] In Gordon v. Goertz, 1996 CanLII 191 (SCC), [1996] 2 SCR 27, the court held that the change in circumstances must not have been foreseen or reasonably contemplated by the judge who made the original order. The change must relate to the condition, means, needs or circumstances of the child and/or the ability of the parents to meet the needs of the child. Change is not enough. The change must have altered the child’s needs or ability of the parents to meet the child’s needs in a fundamental way. Further, the change should represent a distinct departure from what the court could have reasonably anticipated in making the previous order.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.