There are no new circumstances present in this case that would justify a change in the order. Nothing has changed in the dynamics of the parties’ relationship. Not only are the parties unable to communicate in a healthy and effective way, the father has been prohibited from having direct communication with the mother for the past three years as a result of his bail conditions and is currently prohibited from communicating with her as a result of a peace bond. Therefore, I find that the continued conflict between the parties since the order was made is not a material change in circumstances as defined in Gordon v. Goertz. (b) Is the father’s increased hearing loss since trial a material change in circumstances?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.