What is the test for applying a principal or rule stated by a reviewing court that is necessary for the review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Mathis, 2d Civil No. B253040 (Cal. App. 2015):
Under the doctrine of law of the case, a principal or rule stated by a reviewing court that is necessary for the court's decision must be applied throughout all later proceedings in the same case. (Water Replenishment Dist. of So. California v. City of Cerritos (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1063, 1071.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a claim of a violation of the constitutional right to confront, does the court apply the de novo standard of review? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from the denial of a motion for acquittal, does the reviewing court apply the same standard as the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a review court to order a review of a judgment made by the Superior Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by a reviewing court to determine that a sentence is cruel and unusual? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal review the judgment of the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of any review? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a lower court's ruling for abuse of power, does the court review the evidence or evaluate the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
