What is the standard of review applied by a reviewing court to determine that a sentence is cruel and unusual?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cruz, H042221 (Cal. App. 2016):

Whether a sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law. (People v. Hamlin (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 1412, 1474.) A reviewing court therefore applies the de novo standard of review when determining whether a defendant's sentence is cruel and unusual punishment. (Ibid.)

Defendant compares this case to People v. Mendez (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 47 (Mendez). Mendez was 18 years old at the time of sentencing and 16 years old at the time he committed his crimes (carjacking, assault with a firearm, second degree robbery,

Page 29

Other Questions


Does section 669 of the California Criminal Code apply to determine whether a determinate or determinate sentence should run concurrently with an indeterminate sentence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the courts in determining whether a section of the California Civil Code is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of a court in sentencing a defendant to a sentence that is within the legislatively determined limits of a criminal sentence? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from the denial of a motion for acquittal, does the reviewing court apply the same standard as the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court in determining whether there was more than one objective? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a comparative sentence review equivalent to that provided for determinately sentenced felons under the "disparate sentence" statute? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.