What is the de novo standard of review applied to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Canida, E065999 (Cal. App. 2017):

This court applies the de novo standard of review to the determination of whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense. (People v. Waidla, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 733.)

B. Discussion

Other Questions


What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does a substantial amount of evidence need to be substantial to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by the trial court to instruct on an assertedly lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by the trial court to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a trial court's failure to instruct the jury on an assertedly lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by the trial court to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to an appeal that contends the trial court should have instructed sua sponte on a lesser included offense or defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court erred in failing to include imperfect self-defense as a crime against the person as a lesser included offense of murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.