What is the test for admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse standard of review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Reyes, H041053 (Cal. App. 2017):
On appeal, we review the trial court's rulings on the admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse of discretion standard of review. (See People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 725 (Waidla).)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admissibility of evidence under the deferential abuse standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of the abuse standard for exclusion of evidence under section 1154 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the context of hearsay or abuse of discretion on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is the admission or exclusion of evidence reviewed for abuse of evidence? (California, United States of America)
