How does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling on the admissibility of evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Devries, H039641 (Cal. App. 2015):
An appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence, including a ruling under Evidence Code section 352 to exclude evidence on the ground that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the possibility of undue consumption of time. (People v. Hamlin (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 1412, 1449.) Under this standard, the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the abuse standard apply to review a ruling by the California Court on the admissibility of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence including one that turns on hearsay? (California, United States of America)
What is the "abuse of standard" applied by appellate judges to review a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence of a handgun? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
