Does the abuse standard apply to review a ruling by the California Court on the admissibility of the evidence?

"An appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard to review any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of the evidence." (People v. Cox (2003) 30 Cal.4th 916, 955.) "That means reversal is not appropriate unless we are compelled to conclude that the trial court ' " 'exercised its discretion in an arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice. [Citations.]' " [Citation.]' " (People v. Paniagua (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 499, 518.) There was no such abuse here.