What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Goodwin, B197574 (Cal. App. 2015):
We review the trial court's ruling for abuse of discretion (People v. Guerra (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1067, 1140 ["we apply an abuse of discretion standard of review to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence"]), and find none.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the abuse of discretion standard of review applicable to any trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence including one that turns on hearsay? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the "abuse of standard" applied by appellate judges to review a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence of a handgun? (California, United States of America)
