The following excerpt is from Heather Jack, et al. v. Gowling, et al., 2011 ONSC 1363 (CanLII):
The clear policy thrust of the Rules of Civil Procedure is that cases are to be tried on their merits. But there are countervailing policy thrusts that can lead to the earlier dismissal of an action. One of them, on which the defendants rely strongly, is the need to ensure compliance with orders made under the Rules. Among the stronger statements of this principle are the following. In Vacca v. Banks (2005), 6 C.P.C. (6th) 22, [2005] O.J. No. 147 (Div. Ct.), Ferrier J. said at para. 27: 27 There comes a time when this court is obliged to meet its responsibility for the effective administration of justice through case management by dismissing an action. Such is the case when the plaintiff repeatedly fails to comply with orders of the court whether or not there has been prejudice to the defendants.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.