How has Rule 6 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Tanya Curé v Helen Kilitzoglou, 2016 ONSC 2635 (CanLII):
The underlying policy of Rule 6 is to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings and to promote the expeditious and inexpensive determination of disputes and to avoid inconsistent judicial findings: Pilon v. Janveaux, [2000] O.J. No. 4743 (S.C.J.) at para. 6.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has Rule 25.11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure been interpreted? (Ontario, Canada)
What steps have been taken in a civil action under Rule 1(8) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the court use the application procedure under rule 14.05(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there will be any material facts in dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for substantial merit on a motion to strike a claim pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for pleading under Rule 21.01, 25.11 and 25.06 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award costs under Rule 24(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is Rule 2 (2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure sufficient to add a fourth fundamental purpose for costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for making an Order under Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
How does rule 16 of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the cost consequences of rule 49.10(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure when a plaintiff is awarded damages in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
