[6] Subrule 2 (2) adds a fourth fundamental purpose for costs: to ensure that the primary objective of the rules is met – that cases are dealt with justly. This provision needs to be read in conjunction with rule 24. Subrule 2 (4) states that counsel have a positive obligation to help the court to promote the primary objective under the rules. Clauses 2 (3) (a) and (b) set out that dealing with a case justly includes ensuring that the procedure is fair to all parties and saving time and expense. Sambasivam v. Pulendrarajah, 2012 ONCJ 711 (CanLII).
[7] Subrule 24 (1) creates a presumption of costs in favour of the successful party. Consideration of success is the starting point in determining costs. Sims-Howarth v. Bilcliffe 2000 CanLII 22584 (ON SC), [2000] O.J. No. 330 (SCJ- Family Court).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.