Rule 57.07 encompasses a two part test. The first step is an inquiry as to whether the lawyer’s conduct falls within the scope of the rule in the sense of causing costs to be incurred unnecessarily, and the second step is to consider whether the imposition of costs is warranted in the circumstances, having regard to the extreme caution principle: Carleton v. Beaverton Hotel, [2009] O.J. 2409 (Div. Ct.), at paras. 17, 21. Discussion
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.