In Loffredi v. Simonetti, [1988] O.J. No. 1340 (Dist. Ct.), Hoilett D.C.J. departed from the cost consequences of rule 49.10(2) as the damages awarded by the jury were unreasonably low. Had the rule been followed, the result would be manifestly unjust to the plaintiff. In this case, the plaintiff was entitled to cost up to the date of the defendant’s Offer and each party bore their own costs thereafter.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.