The trial judge gave a fair and impartial charge to the jury, which included a specific causation direction based on Athey v. Leonati, 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458. On all the evidence the jury was entitled to reject the plaintiff’s position that his ongoing medical difficulties were caused by the motor vehicle accident and to reflect this finding in its assessment of damages. In our view, the jury’s verdict and assessment of damages was not perverse.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.