In reviewing a purportedly erroneous instruction, what is the test for determining whether the jury has applied the instruction in a way that violates the Constitution?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Garcilazo, B285170 (Cal. App. 2019):
In reviewing a purportedly erroneous instruction, we ask whether there is a reasonable likelihood the jury has applied the instruction in a way that violates the Constitution. (People v. Richardson, supra, 43 Cal.4th at p. 1028.) An instruction must be viewed in the context of the overall charge, which we presume jurors grasp. (Ibid.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review in determining whether jury instructions in a personal injury case apply the law? (California, United States of America)
Does section 669 of the California Criminal Code apply to determine whether a determinate or determinate sentence should run concurrently with an indeterminate sentence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a claim of a violation of the constitutional right to confront, does the court apply the de novo standard of review? (California, United States of America)
Does a new standard of review apply when determining whether the jury instructions were proper? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether a statute is constitutional or interpreted as a question of law? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining whether to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to determine whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct on a lesser included offense? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence from a search warrant, what is the test for determining whether the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an instruction is erroneous? (California, United States of America)
