In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Chargualaf, G050219 (Cal. App. 2015):
In reviewing the denial of a suppression motion, "[w]e defer to the trial court's factual findings, express or implied, where supported by substantial evidence." (People v. Glaser (1995) 11 Cal.4th 354, 362.) "In determining whether, on the facts so found, the search or seizure was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, we exercise our independent judgment." (Ibid.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of a suppression motion, what is the test for relying solely on the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing an order denying a motion to suppress, does the court have any authority to review the fact finding of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court defer to the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a suppression motion on appeal, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a finding on a suppression motion, what are the implications of the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of suppression motion, what is the effect of the finding of reasonableness of the officer's conduct in denying suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, what presumptions are in favor of the trial court's factual findings? (California, United States of America)
