How have courts reviewed rulings on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Iota Five, LLC v. Dobron, G050738 (Cal. App. 2015):
The trial court's rulings on the admissibility of evidence, whether made in limine or during trial, are reviewed for abuse of discretion. (People ex rel. Harris v. Sarpas (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 1539, 1555.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence of other crimes? (California, United States of America)
