How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Huezo, B233864 (Cal. App. 2012):
The trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on Evidence Code section 352 is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review. (See People v. Avila (2006) 38 Cal.4th 491, 578 ["We review for abuse of discretion a trial court's rulings on relevance and the exclusion of evidence under Evidence Code section 352"].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that a prosecutor improperly admitted evidence of sexual assault under section 352(b) of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's ruling on evidentiary objections based on papers alone reviewed for abuse or reviewed de novo? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Will questions relating to the admissibility of evidence be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a specific and timely objection in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
