The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sitton, 103 F.3d 143 (9th Cir. 1996):
Sitton contends that he was erroneously sentenced because the government failed to prove that his drug conspiracy conviction involved d-methamphetamine rather than l-methamphetamine. Because he did not object at sentencing or on direct appeal, his claim is foreclosed by United States v. McMullen, No. 95-36031, slip op. at 14013 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.