The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Chapman, 29 F.3d 635 (9th Cir. 1994):
Subsequent to this change, we have held that a district court's failure to engage in a foreseeability analysis to determine the amount attributable to each defendant convicted of a conspiracy for purposes of sentencing is reversible error. See United States v. Petty, 992 F.2d 887 (9th Cir.1993).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.