The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Green, 993 F.2d 885 (9th Cir. 1993):
Green raises three other challenges to his sentence, each of which we reject. First, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence that he possessed the methamphetamine found in his kitchen. We review the district court's factual findings for clear error, United States v. Uzelac, 921 F.2d 204, 205 (9th Cir.1990), and find none. Green apparently lived alone, so the court's inference that he possessed the drugs found in his home, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, is not clearly erroneous.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.