The following excerpt is from Underwood v. U.S., 166 F.3d 84 (2nd Cir. 1999):
At the time of Underwood's sentencing, our precedents recognized narcotics conspiracy as a lesser-included offense of a continuing criminal enterprise. See United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733, 748-50 (2d Cir.1984). We allowed sentences under 846 and 848 to be combined on the understanding that the 846 conviction did not "exist ... separate[ly]" and had no "collateral consequences" while the 848 conviction remained in place. United States v. Aiello, 771 F.2d 621, 633, 634 n. 6 (2d Cir.1985) (internal quotations omitted). The "combined lesser conviction could not properly be considered, for instance, in determining a defendant's eligibility for parole, in sentencing him in the future under a recidivist statute or in impeaching his credibility at a later trial." Id. at 633-34. Only if the greater conviction were vacated would we "resuscitate the lesser conviction and permit punishment for the lesser crime." Id. at 634.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.