The following excerpt is from Virdi, Sidhu and Bhumber v. Unicity Taxi Ltd. et al., 2005 MBQB 91 (CanLII):
Unicity also points out that Morton v. Asper, [1988] MJ No. 424, stands for the proposition that, where a matter falls within an arbitration clause, the onus falls upon the party resisting a stay to demonstrate why the court ought to exercise its discretion to deny the stay. VII. PLAINTIFFS' POSITION
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.