5 The standard of review of these issues is clear. A court of appeal should not interfere in the decision of the motion judge in the absence of a material error, a serious misapprehension of the evidence or an error of law. See Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014. In this case, the motion judge was also the trial judge. He is familiar with the history of these parties, had heard all the evidence and read all the material over a significant period of time.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.