In an appeal of an interlocutory discretionary decision, this court will not interfere with the decision absent misdirection by the motion judge or unless his or her decision is so clearly wrong as to amount to an injustice (see Elsom v. Elsom, 1989 CanLII 100 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1367 at 1375). Intervention is necessary in this case as the judge misdirected himself on the law in refusing the agency’s request for production of the electronic communications.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.