25 A discretionary decision such as described above is reviewed on appeal according to a highly deferential standard, often described in this way; see Elsom v. Elsom, 1989 CanLII 100 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1367 (at p. 1375): … [A]n appellate court will be justified in intervening in a trial judge’s exercise of his discretion only if the trial judge misdirects himself or if his decision is so clearly wrong as to amount to an injustice. ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.