I'am not bound by, nor do I agree with, the reference to the sometime necessity for an affidavit on a motion of this nature as stated in the case of Steiner v. Lindzon (supra). The requirement for particulars is something that arises from a study of the pleadings. It is not enhanced in any way by a litigant swearing an affidavit parroting what should be a submission of counsel, i.e. that the material facts necessary to plead to the statement of claim are not present. A party is entitled to know the case it has to meet.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.