What is the test for deference to an arbitrator's decision in a personal injury case?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from Parkland Regional Health Authority v. Manitoba Nurses' Union, 2007 MBQB 162 (CanLII):
Major J. concluded that in the circumstances the arbitrator’s decision was entitled to a measure of deference, the appropriate standard of which was reasonableness, as articulated in Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247, 2003 SCC 20 (herein “Ryan”).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the applicable standard of review for the appeal of a decision in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the court’s position on costs for personal injury cases in the context of the case management system? (Manitoba, Canada)
What considerations must be considered in the context of a motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for new evidence in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the definition of a "factual situation" in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What are the implications of a plaintiff’s new pleadings in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the range of damages for battery and sexual assault in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is the Respondent entitled to reasonable costs in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for determining the range of general damages in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
What constitutes a scandalous pleading in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
