The following excerpt is from Dixon v. XPO Logistics, LLC, Case No.: 3:18-cv-2743-L-MDD (S.D. Cal. 2020):
While stray remarks of non-decision makers may be probative, they "do not constitute 'direct evidence' of discriminatory animus." Reid v. Google, 50 Cal.4th 512,
Page 8
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.