The following excerpt is from Forest Ethics Advocacy Association v. Canada (National Energy Board), 2014 FCA 245 (CanLII), [2015] 4 FCR 75:
If administrative decision-makers could be bypassed on issues such as this, those appreciations, insights and understandings would never be placed before the reviewing court. In constitutional matters, this is most serious. Constitutional issues should only be decided on the basis of a full, rich factual record: Mackay v. Manitoba, 1989 CanLII 26 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 357 at pages 361-363. Within an important regulatory sector such as this, a record is neither full nor rich if the insights of the regulator are missing.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.