The following excerpt is from Kentmaster Mfg. Co. v. Jarvis Products Corp., 146 F.3d 691 (9th Cir. 1998):
Such amendment would merely enlarge on the legal theory rejected by this opinion. There is no purpose in allowing a futile amendment. Newland v. Dalton, 81 F.3d 904 (9th Cir.1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.