It is well-established in the jurisprudence that a decision-maker is not required to refer to all of the evidence before it, as the decision-maker is presumed to have been considered all of the evidence: Simpson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FCA 82. This presumption can be rebutted if an applicant can establish that the evidence was of such probative value that the decision-maker ought to have considered it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.