What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Robles, F068542 (Cal. App. 2016):

Expert testimony is admissible on any subject sufficiently beyond common experience such that the opinion of an expert would assist the trier of fact. (Evid. Code, 801, subd. (a); People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 892, 905.) A trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to admit or exclude expert testimony, and its decision will

Page 39

Other Questions


In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony from a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.