What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Santana, 2d Crim. No. B261900 (Cal. App. 2016):
The trial court has broad discretion in deciding to admit or exclude expert testimony, and we review its ruling for an abuse of discretion. (People v. McDowell (2012) 54 Cal.4th 395, 426.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that expert testimony may be available at trial require defense counsel to consult the experts or present their testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony from a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at a trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting or excluding expert testimony at trial? (California, United States of America)
