California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anyadike, B226853 (Cal. App. 2012):
Sufficient evidence established that appellants acted with "the specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal conduct by gang members . . . ." ( 186.22, subd. (b)(1).) (See People v. Morales (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1198.) Because substantial evidence supports a finding that the crimes benefitted the gang, reversal cannot be justified by the possibility that the evidence might have been reconciled with a
Page 12
finding that appellants acted only for personal reasons. (See People v. Albillar, supra, 51 Cal.4th at p. 60.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.