What is the standard of review for substantial Page 3 evidence?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mejia-Ruiz v. Wilkinson, 18-3013 NAC (2nd Cir. 2021):
The applicable standards of review are well established. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(4)(B); Paloka v. Holder, 762 F.3d 191, 195 (2d Cir. 2014) (reviewing factual findings for substantial
Page 3
evidence and questions of law de novo).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review on both the substantial and substantial evidence and the substantial evidence test? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard for establishing that substantial evidence is sufficient? ("New York", United States of America)
Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard in reviewing evidence at a review of a severe and prolonged disability analysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support criminal conviction, what is the standard of review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing verdicts for sufficiency of the evidence, what are the guidelines used by the courts in reviewing the evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the preponderance of the evidence standard and what is the clear and convincing evidence standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard for the use of the preponderance of the evidence standard in a civil case where a police officer's testimony is hearsay? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
