The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Fernandez-Vidana, 857 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1988):
Only when the hearsay is so inadequately supported that "the factual basis for believing [it is] almost nil" can it be argued that the evidence should not have been considered. Id. (quoting United States v. Weston, 448 F.2d 626, 633 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1061, 92 S.Ct. 748, 30 L.Ed.2d 749 (1972). The officer's hearsay testimony does not meet this standard.
III. Use of the Preponderance of the Evidence Standard
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.