Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard in reviewing evidence at a review of a severe and prolonged disability analysis?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Arthurs v. Canada (Minister of Social Development), 2006 FC 1107 (CanLII):
The applicant submitted that the appropriate standard in reviewing the assessment of evidence by a Review Tribunal in a section 42 severe and prolonged disability analysis is patent unreasonableness (see Spears v. Canada (Attorney General), 2004 FCA 193 at paragraph 10).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
If a claimant is disabled or not disabled at any stage of the disability review process, is that step terminated? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review on both the substantial and substantial evidence and the substantial evidence test? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the appropriate standard of review in an application for judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the preponderance of the evidence standard and what is the clear and convincing evidence standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing verdicts for sufficiency of the evidence, what are the guidelines used by the courts in reviewing the evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support criminal conviction, what is the standard of review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the appropriate standard upon which to review whether the Officer erred in her treatment of evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision of the board of trustees to deny accidental disability benefits but to grant ordinary disability benefits? ("New York", United States of America)
