California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Baker v. Aubry, 216 Cal.App.3d 1259, 265 Cal.Rptr. 381 (Cal. App. 1989):
Preliminarily we note that on review of the trial court's ruling on a writ of mandate, an appellate court is ordinarily limited to an inquiry respecting whether substantial evidence supports the judgment. However, this limitation is inapplicable to questions of law where the facts are undisputed. In such instances the appellate court is not bound by the trial court's determination but may make its own determination. (Evans v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 398, 407, 216 Cal.Rptr. 782, 703 P.2d 122.) The following undisputed facts were before the trial court.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.