California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from William S. Hart Union High School Dist. v. Regional Planning Com., 226 Cal.App.3d 1612, 277 Cal.Rptr. 645 (Cal. App. 1991):
13 If the local agency's action is legislative in nature, then an "arbitrary or capricious" standard is used (Code Civ.Proc. 1085). If the action taken was quasi-judicial in nature, then either the independent judgment rule (for cases involving fundamental, vested rights) or the substantial evidence test will be used by the trial court (Code Civ.Proc. 1094.5). (Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 65 Cal.App.3d at pp. 727-728, 135 Cal.Rptr. 588.) However, "Where ... an agency in two capacities is simultaneously disposing of two legally required functions with but one decision, review of that determination must be by the more stringent standard." (Id. at p. 729, 135 Cal.Rptr. 588.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.