California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hogg, A155771 (Cal. App. 2020):
No. 225 only "when the defendant's specific intent or mental state is the only element of the offense that rests substantially or entirely on circumstantial evidence." (People v. Honig, supra, 48 Cal.App.4th at p. 341.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.