How have courts interpreted the test for determining whether trial counsel acted or failed to act in the manner challenged on appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Granger, A123363 (Cal. App. 2011):
18. If the record does not disclose the reasons trial counsel acted or failed to act in the manner challenged on appeal, we must assume counsel had a reasonable basis for acting or failing to act "unless the record . . . precludes the possibility of a satisfactory explanation" for trial counsel's action. (People v. Ledesma (2006) 39 Cal.4th 641, 746.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defense counsel appeal against an admonition from the trial court for failing to timely object to challenged statements made by defense counsel regarding sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal in determining whether a defendant received a fair trial due to a series of trial errors? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal claiming that he failed to raise his constitutional claims in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial on the grounds of misconduct of counsel? (California, United States of America)
