The following excerpt is from Huerta v. Marshall, 116 F.3d 484 (9th Cir. 1997):
We review de novo a district court's denial of a section 2254 habeas petition. See Sanders v. Ratelle, 21 F.3d 1446, 1451 (9th Cir.1994). A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact reviewed de novo. See McDowell v. Calderon, 107 F.3d 1351, 1356 (9th Cir.1997).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.