The following excerpt is from Boston v. Roe, 122 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 1997):
1 Boston also contends that this attorney was ineffective on several additional grounds, which we decline to consider because Boston did not present them to the district court in his habeas petition. See Morgan v. Bunnell, 24 F.3d 49, 52 (9th Cir.1994).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.