Can a federal habeas court rule that ineffective assistance was ineffective assistance in a state petition?

Petitioner first raised the issue of ineffective assistance in his state petition in the 5^th DCA and repeated his contention again in the state supreme court. Both appellate courts summarily denied the claim without issuing a reasoned decision for the denial. When a state court decision on a petitioner's claims rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, a federal habeas court must presume, subject to rebuttal, that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits. Johnson v. Williams,

Page 10

U.S. , , 133 S.Ct. 1088, 1091 (2013).